ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 Review – Talented Standmounters

ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 front main

Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2

Tested at $249

Sound quality









  • Natural tonality
  • Great imaging
  • Incisive


  • Needs care with matching

ELAC Debut series has been around for some time now, and the B5.2 we have here is a member of its latest iteration – Debut 2.0. What’s interesting about this particular iteration is that it was designed by the famed speaker designer Andrew Jones, that started cooperating with Elac recently. Initially, their attention went to higher-end models but some of those ideas did finally boil down to the every-man Debut series. So, were these little guys worth all that hype? Let’s see.

Build and Features

Looking from the outside, there’s nothing unusual about Debut B5.2. It’s a small speaker finished to a good standard for the price and reassuringly weighty when lifted. The bass/midrange unit is 5.25″ in diameter, while the tweeter is protected with a mesh wire, meaning no worries that some little fingers will lose their way and damage your precious tweeters (my personal nightmare with exposed domes). Bass reflex is located on the front making placement just a tad easier. On the back, we have one pair of binding posts that feels quality made. Sensitivity is rated at a pretty low 86 dB while nominal impedance is 6 Ohms. These numbers are nothing to worry about, but it means that B5.2 will thank you for an amp with a healthy dose of power and control.


Just for fun, I tried these Elacs with a dirty cheap Arylic A30 digital amp first and got a very thin and flat sound; this combo was a no go. Moving to the vintage Luxman A-225 things looked much, much better. This old but sonically balanced amp was a great match for Elacs and resulted in a sound one could easily live with. In the end, I hooked them to my Cyrus 8vs2 that showcased just how well these speakers scale with better amplification. At all times, amps were fed with the Denafrips Ares II DAC. That said, how do they actually sound?


The first thing that struck me is how tonally correct Debut 2.0 B5.2 is. Frequency response is even-handed and smooth, and I’m not able to notice where one driver ends and the other takes over (something easily noticeable with many speakers for a trained ear). That said, I still plan to dissect the sound a bit.

Bass is as deep as you can expect from a box of this size. It will produce a decent amount of bass down to around fifty Herz, and even a tad lower with a help of a smaller room. Bassline provides very decent weight to the sound but it will not produce much of the punch and slam. To be fair, no speaker of this size and price can do it either. The mid-bass region is full and juicy, lending a healthy dose of boldness to the midrange. Talking about the midrange, it feels very neutral and even-handed, without any nasties that would make vocals sound boomy or hissy. It’s highly informative and transitions smoothly to the highest region, which is bright and airy. Now, I never felt Debut 2.0 B5.2 to be overly bright or edgy, but dark or sweet it’s definitely not. With these, you’ll hear the moment a microphone turns on and that slight background noise we call air or atmosphere easily.

Moving away from the frequency response, B5.2 is able to create a very decent soundstage of reasonable width and commendable depth. All of the instruments are positioned and layered with a skill that’s usually hard to come by at this price point. Dynamically speaking, these are not party speakers and I found them to be best suitable for some calmer music genres such as Jazz, Blues, Acoustics, etc. This doesn’t mean that Rock and Electro will not sound good too, but you should scale your expectation when it comes to high octane music. There’s a reason people put up with those big and space-consuming boxes after all. But for what it is, ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 is capable of producing some serious hi-fidelity sound.


Wharfedale Diamond 220 are midrange masters with full and lush vocals. However, they can’t match Debuts smoothness across the range and sound a bit grainy at the top end. Debut is also more skilled when it comes to sound-staging and layering.

Q Acoustics 3030i is slightly bigger and more expensive. It offers more grunt in the bassline and sounds a little bit livelier dynamically. It’s also very good with sound-staging and layering, but its frequency response is not as even-handed. The higher midrange is slightly pronounced, while the highest spectrum is tamer in comparison to Elacs. Tonally, I would give this one to B5.2 but 3030i counters with greater drive and dynamics. I believe B6.2 would prove to be a better competitor on that front since it’s closer in size to 3030i.


Even after hearing all the praises other reviewers had to offer about these Elacs, I haven’t predicted getting this fond of them. Other products in this price range may offer more excitement or present an easier load for your amp, but I have yet to hear the one sounding this masterfully and naturally balanced. Given capable amplification, Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2 is easily one of the best budget speakers ever produced and deserves the highest recommendation.


Enclosure Type: 2- Way Bass Reflex
Frequency Response: 46Hz – 35000Hz
Nominal Impedance: 6 Ohms
Sensitivity: 86db @2.83v/1m
Crossover Frequency: 2200Hz
Max Power Input: 120 Watts
Tweeter: 1″ Cloth Dome
Woofer: 5-1/4″ Aramid Fiber
Cabinet: CARB2 Rated MDF
Cabinet Finish: Black Ash Vinyl
Port: Dual Flared
Binding Posts: 5 – Way Metal
Dimensions (WxHxD) : 7.09″ x 13.43″ x 9.21″

Official product page

6 thoughts on “ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 Review – Talented Standmounters

  1. Another good review from you, thanks.

    Which ones do you think go best with an older Sony amplifier like the TA-F650ESD (2x80w 8ohm), the DEBUT 2.0 B5.2 or the DIAMOND 220.


      I already answered in YT comments so I’ll just copy that one: If memory serves me well, Sony amps of that age are slightly brighter in tonality. If that’s the case then I believe that Diamond might be a better match tonally.

Hi Srboljub
I don’t know if you’ve heard the originals of these but if not you should really give them a try. I much preferred them to the mk2, they had a magical quality to the sound on my system which was completely lost with the new one. To be more specific, they had lower bass, a bigger sound stage and were tonally much more pleasant to my ears. Admittedly they had less detail in the treble, but that was the only thing they gave way to the new version in my opinion. Then again, it could just be the synergy of my system which brought out the best of the mk1

Hey, thank you for your work! I’m impressed. Great reviews on YouTube and here. I started with wharfedale D220 with DA9, currently I have Elac B5.2 with DA9 – but I have the opportunity to buy QA 3020i for 190euro and I wonder whether to change Elac to QA – is it worth it? I do not have the opportunity to listen to them directly. I was thinking about adding elac Sub 3010 to B5.2. What do you think? QA are nicer but will they play better than Elac B5.2?

    Hi, sorry for the late response, I’m kind of chaotic at the moment. Personally, I probably like Elac’s tonality better than QA, I also consider it more neutral, so I wouldn’t change B5.2. That said, you might be a fan of QA tuning and find it more pleasing to your ears since it is a matter of taste after all and both of these are very good speakers.

Hi i’m looking for some new speakers for my home cinema system and also for a lot of music
system Marantz 7015 and kef 2001 satellite plus base to match will these speaker work well i mostly play at low volume and use my pc as a playback for everything via a hdmi cable to my tv and from there to my 7015 yours PHP


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top